投稿者: Tetsuro Higashi

The South Pacific at the Front Line of Geopolitical Tensions

In recent years, the South Pacific region has emerged as a frontline of intensifying geopolitical tensions. Under China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), massive investments have flowed into the region, with infrastructure development and economic assistance appealing to many Pacific island nations. At the same time, however, concerns have grown that these moves constitute “economic aggression.” Between 2008 and 2022, China poured enormous development funds into Pacific Island countries, leading to a series of cases in which diplomatic recognition was shifted.

From 2019 to 2024, Kiribati, the Solomon Islands, and Nauru severed diplomatic ties with Taiwan and realigned toward China. In response, the United States and Australia have accelerated alliance-building efforts, expanding both military and economic assistance. At the 2025 Pacific Islands Forum (PIF), China’s growing influence, climate change, and security became the central agenda items. With Taiwan-aligned Palau set to host the forum next year, tensions in the region have reached a peak.

Palau Becomes a Target of China

Among the cases drawing particular attention is that of the Republic of Palau. With a population of approximately 18,000, Palau is one of Taiwan’s few remaining diplomatic allies and has consequently become a prime target of Chinese pressure.

On September 15, 2025, at the International Military Law and Operations Conference hosted by U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM), Palauan President Surangel Whipps Jr. delivered a striking statement. “We are already in a state of war,” he declared. “China is deliberately working to weaken our leadership, disrupt essential services, and undermine trust in our government.” He cited economic coercion, cyberattacks, and drug trafficking as concrete examples, strongly calling for deeper partnerships with the United States and its allies. Issued just ahead of the PIF, his remarks heightened alertness across the entire region.

China’s economic pressure on Palau has focused on exploiting the country’s vulnerability stemming from its dependence on tourism. Tourism revenue accounts for roughly 40 percent of Palau’s GDP, and the sharp decline in Chinese visitors has dealt a severe blow. According to President Whipps, annual Chinese tourist arrivals exceeded 100,000 in the early 2010s but plummeted after Palau maintained diplomatic relations with Taiwan. One Chinese ambassador reportedly made a coercive proposal, stating that China would send “one million tourists” if Palau severed ties with Taiwan. Palau refused, and as a result has faced economic isolation.

Chinese Fentanyl and Other Illegal Drugs Washing Ashore

The situation has been further aggravated by land acquisitions by Chinese-linked investors. In multiple cases, land near U.S. military facilities has been acquired under 99-year leases, only to be left undeveloped and vacant. This has fueled distrust among local residents and exacerbated social divisions. Although China officially denies involvement, such “gray-zone” operations are a textbook method of converting economic influence into leverage for diplomatic realignment.

Cyberattacks have also escalated. In March 2024, an incident reportedly occurred in which China-linked hackers breached Palau’s government systems and stole sensitive data. Government websites experienced repeated outages and data leaks, pushing administrative functions to the brink of paralysis. President Whipps has characterized these incidents as part of China’s “hybrid threats” and has also pointed to a rise in drug trafficking. Illegal drugs, including Chinese-produced fentanyl, have washed up on Palau’s shores, fueling addiction among young people. The president argues that these are not merely criminal acts but components of a state-led strategy to weaken the country. Indeed, Chinese criminal syndicates have become increasingly active across the Pacific region, operating in the shadows of economic penetration, leaving Palau with little choice but to feel that it is “already at war.”

Palau as a Microcosm of the South Pacific

The United States has responded swiftly. According to a July 2025 report by The Washington Post, the U.S. military plans to upgrade Palau’s main port, Malakal Harbor, in 2026. The project includes the construction of submarine docks and logistics facilities, effectively transforming a port primarily used by tourist vessels into a military hub. This initiative is based on the extension of the Compact of Free Association (COFA) between the United States and Palau and will expand rotational U.S. force deployments. The goal is to strengthen Palau’s role as a strategic linchpin in the Indo-Pacific region.

Meanwhile, Australia has concluded a defense agreement with Papua New Guinea (PNG), reinforcing regional alliances. However, Vanuatu has maintained its pro-China stance, highlighting the region’s complex power dynamics. Responding to President Whipps’ appeal, INDOPACOM Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo emphasized that “deterrence grows exponentially through alliances—two countries create four times the deterrence, three countries nine times.” He argued that peace is achieved through “deterrence by presence.”

Palau’s situation is a microcosm of the South Pacific. While China’s economic assistance helps address infrastructure gaps, it also carries significant risks, including debt traps and diplomatic dependency. Analyses by the Lowy Institute suggest that Chinese investment may serve as a precursor to military basing, raising concerns about the region becoming a proxy theater in U.S.–China rivalry. Palau continues to resist pressure in order to preserve its ties with Taiwan, but the economic costs are severe. The international community must move beyond simple aid and build sustainable partnerships. As Palau prepares to host the 2026 PIF, regional stability hinges on a “competitive peace” between the United States and China. Palau’s voice is a warning that cannot be ignored.

About the Author

Daiju Wada is a researcher specializing in diplomacy and security. He is the CEO of Strategic Intelligence Co., Ltd., a board member of the Japan Counterintelligence Association, and a lecturer at Seiwa University. His research fields include international politics, security studies, international terrorism, and economic security. While working as an academic, he is also a practitioner, providing geopolitical and economic security risk consulting (including intelligence briefings, advisory services, and seminars) for companies expanding overseas.

：

顔も本名も明かさず描き続けてきた89歳の画家が「人生初の大規模個展」　学芸員が込めた思いは　岡山

女性ヌードに「男性的な躍動感」を見るとき、それは決して女性性の否定ではない。むしろ、身体の奥深くに眠る意志の強さ、重力に抗う筋肉の張り、踏み出す一歩に宿る決断力――そうしたものが一瞬、可視化された結果なのだと思う。

しなやかな肢体が空間を切り裂くように伸び、骨格は明確に、しかし決して硬くならない。そこには力があるが、誇示はない。支配でも攻撃でもなく、「生きる」という根源的な衝動が、身体表現として立ち上がってくる。その姿は、古代彫刻が持つ静かな英雄性にも似ているが、同時に、現代を生きる一人の女性の呼吸が、確かに感じられる。

美しいヌードとは、形の完成度だけでは成立しない。ポーズの奥にある心の姿勢――演じる女性が、自らの身体をどう信じ、どう引き受けているかが、決定的に重要だ。恥じらいを超え、媚びることなく、かといって虚勢も張らず、ただ「私はここに立つ」と言う。その覚悟が、筋肉の緊張や視線の強度となって現れる。

男性的と呼ばれる躍動感は、本来、人間的なものだ。女性がそれを内包するとき、身体は二重の意味で美しくなる。柔らかさの中に芯が生まれ、静けさの中に運動が宿る。その矛盾を引き受ける勇気こそが、ヌードを単なる裸身から、表現へと昇華させる。

その女性は、見られる存在である前に、表現する主体だ。カメラや画布の前で、彼女は自分の身体に問いかけ、応答する。その往復運動の中で生まれたヌードは、観る者に問いを返す――あなたは、この強さと美しさを、どう受け取るのか、と。